Rochelle Coloma
Blog Post #3
All three
interviews were very compelling and showed different sides to Ta-Nehisi Coates.
The interviews included aspects of his personal life, his beliefs, and being an
author. From a viewer standpoint, the interviewers were not afraid
to ask deep, controversial questions. For Ta-Nehisi, his responses evoked
critical and carefully thought out words. He then furthers his responses by
going into greater detail, as if telling a story, for better clarification.
In the
first interview with David Remnick, I got a sense that both had respect for one
another and when it came time for the harder questions, Ta-Nehisi responded at
full force. There was so much passion and knowledge behind his words that if
often left me thinking more. For example, the interviewer brought up his
encounter with Cornell West and asked him how their meeting transpired. West
was someone who gave Ta-Nehisi a bad review where he disagreed on many of the
things Ta-Nehisi believed in. During his meeting with Cornell West, he
describes him to be aggressive with his words. I was awed that rather arguing
back he left that conversation without creating any tension and thought West to
be inspirational in some sorts. West was a sort of challenge that Ta-Nehisi
acknowledged and welcomed. Also, it was a way for him to understand that not everyone will
agree on his views. In one part of the interview, David stopped Ta-Nehisi when
we said, “The World has it more righter than America like China and Russia.”
David immediately questioned him how was it that Russia's dealings with mass
incarceration were better than America. The sudden question gave way for
Ta-Nehisi to improvise and responded back with some statistics. He explains
that there is a ratio of 750 inmates per 100,000 in America and Russia had 500
inmates per 100,000. This diversion allowed not only the interviewer but also
the listeners as well to have a better understanding.
As we continue to see these sides of Ta-Nehisi Coates in his
own works, his attention to detail and intellect were factors that allowed the
interview process seamless and inspiring at the same time.
No comments:
Post a Comment